Face-to-Face vs. Cyberspace: Finding the Middle Ground
        
        
        
        Although not as contentious as the conflict in The War of the Worlds, 
  there has long been a division between distance learning and face-to-face, on-campus 
  programs. Here, W. Sean Chamberlin explores the middle ground, where the best 
  elements of distance and face-to-face learning can be merged.
In H.G. Wells’ 1898 novel The War of the Worlds, an army of nefarious 
  Martians attacks Earth in an attempt to destroy humanity and wrest control of 
  our planet. All attempts by humans to stop the invaders fail, yet Earth is saved 
  when the aliens succumb to a fatal microscopic infection.
To some, the invasion of cyber teaching in the landscape of academia incites 
  an equally repulsive reaction. The invaders who hail online education as the 
  “end of teaching as we know it” are temporarily driven back with comments 
  such as “it’s only a fad” or “they said the same thing about 
  tele-courses.” Proponents may cite benefits or no significant difference, 
  while naysayers see detriments and high dropout rates.
This war of the worlds between on-campus teaching and online teaching rages 
  on nearly every campus and fuels debate about the usefulness of cyberspace as 
  an environment for teaching and learning. Some desire an end to cyber teaching 
  similar to that which befell Wells’ Martian invaders, while others envision 
  a world bathed in the peaceful glow of computer monitors from which all knowledge 
  emanates.
Thankfully, there is a middle ground. Many of us use the Internet to supplement 
  our campus courses or teach hybrid courses, partially on-campus and partially 
  online. Some of us teach fully on-campus and fully online courses at the same 
  time. But all of us who teach in both worlds are double agents, caught in a 
  struggle to bridge those worlds, and make effective use of both face-to-face 
  and online environments to ensure successful teaching and learning.
By taking advantage of the pedagogical strengths of on-campus and online teaching, 
  instructors can offer students the greatest chance to discover their strengths 
  and weaknesses as learners and the best opportunity to find their path to achieving 
  success. In my courses, this result has been accomplished by using the same 
  syllabus and course guidelines for all students, regardless of whether they 
  are enrolled on-campus or online.
    
What are the Differences?
It is beyond the scope of this article to discuss the entire range of differences 
  between face-to-face and online teaching, but let’s examine a few examples 
  of key areas in which differences are exposed.
The differences are perhaps most obvious in terms of communications. Direct 
  face-to-face interactions between student and instructor and/or other students 
  may or may not occur on campus, but communications are virtually impossible 
  to avoid online.
Clearly, each of these types of communications has its benefits. Although in-person 
  communication provides opportunities to clarify and restate (and to take advantage 
  of tone of voice and body language), many students are reluctant to engage in 
  direct communication with an instructor or their fellow classmates. Online communications 
  via e-mail, mailing lists, and discussion boards or chat rooms can level the 
  playing field and remove some of the psychological and social barriers to student-teacher 
  and student-student interactions.